英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：

flabby    音标拼音: [fl'æbi]
a. 软弱的,没气力的,不稳的,松弛的

软弱的,没气力的,不稳的,松弛的

flabby
adj 1: out of condition; not strong or robust; incapable of
exertion or endurance; "he was too soft for the army";
"flabby around the middle"; "flaccid cheeks" [synonym:
{soft}, {flabby}, {flaccid}]

flabby \flab"by\ (fl[a^]b"b[y^]), a. [See {Flap}.]
Yielding to the touch, and easily moved or shaken; hanging
loose by its own weight; wanting firmness; flaccid; as,
flabby flesh.
[1913 Webster]


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
flabby查看　flabby　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
flabby查看　flabby　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
flabby查看　flabby　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • AITAH - Reddit
    r AITAH: this is a community like r AmITheAsshole except unlike that subreddit here you can post interpersonal conflicts, anything that's AITA but is…
  • Is 137 WPM good on monkeytype? : r typing - Reddit
    if your goal is to have fun and you are meeting that goal, then yea 137 is good it’s really hard to say what speed is fast or slow when it comes to typing because of the vast range, from the average adult at 40 wpm to joshu bailey and rocket at 250+ wpm so ya I would say 137 is good but it’s all relative
  • How does monkeytype calculate WPM : r learntyping - Reddit
    It's in their about page Raw includes incorrect words wpm - total amount of characters in the correctly typed words (including spaces), divided by 5 and normalised to 60 seconds raw wpm - calculated just like wpm, but also includes incorrect words
  • Whats a good average? : r monkeytype - Reddit
    true I did read online that the good average wpm is 60, but that seems extremely low to me My average is 100+ with 96%+ accuracy This is my best result so far Since I don't consider myself a typing beast, I always tought this was the average Was I wrong?
  • An observation and question regarding Monkeytype. . . : r monkeytype - Reddit
    Whether you are just starting, a polyglot or a language nerd, this is the place for you! OpenAI is an AI research and deployment company OpenAI's mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity We are an unofficial community OpenAI makes ChatGPT, GPT-4, and DALL·E 3
  • Monkeytype guide updated to version 4. 0 : r typing - Reddit
    I have rewritten the guide I have halved the word count and the document is now hopefully a more useful and efficent read overall Gary Internet's Monkeytype Guide version 4 0
  • Monkeytype Guide updated to version 6. 0 : r typing - Reddit
    I've updated typing guide to version 6 0 I took the decision to massively reduce the word count Previous versions of this guide had seen the word count climb higher than 15,000 Even when I reduced it to 10,000 this guide was still far more bloated and less useful than it could have been With this new version of the guide, it's less than 1,600 words and in my opinion, says everything it
  • Alternative sites to Monkeytype? : r typing - Reddit
    Hi all, I’m wondering if there are any good alternatives to monkey type? I am particularly interested in accuracy and overall consistency of…
  • Using monkeytype to get faster, by trying for accuracy instead. . . : r . . .
    true I've been using monkeytype (among other sites) off and on for a long time Last Nov I started a 30 day challenge to see how much faster I could learn to type I found that trying to type as fast as possible was almost counterproductive, and aiming to simply be more accurate (at the expense of speed), ironically ended up really improving my typing speed in the end Has anyone else had
  • What is really a typical typing speed? : r monkeytype - Reddit
    true So I just typed 46wpm and it felt seriously slow, stumbling over incorrect words and such, about 86% accuracy but that was a random words Next I typed a quote out at 62wpm at 95% which felt like a satisfying speed and accuracy for me Is that considered good or is the "average" screwed way down by the number of really slow typers? I haven't gotten down touch typing to a T yet (use all





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009